Rainbow vs MetaMask
NotaPágina localizada automáticamente: títulos, cifras clave y categorías en español; las descripciones detalladas y los datos verificados provienen del perfil original en inglés.
Respuesta breveBoth are web3-native neobanks. MetaMask pays yield on balances. Compare custody, license, FX markup and fees field by field below.
Comparación directa
| Rainbow | MetaMask | |
|---|---|---|
| Categoría | web3-nativo | web3-nativo |
| Público | general | general |
| Sede | New York, US | Consensys (global) |
| Fundada | 2019 | 2016 |
| Custodia | Autocustodia | Autocustodia |
| Tipo de regulación | Software de autocustodia | Software de autocustodia |
| Detalle de licencia | — | Self-custodial software — no banking license needed; card via licensed issuer partners |
| Tarjeta | Sin tarjeta | MC · Virtual + physical |
| Cashback | Points | Card rewards (region) |
| Rendimiento | — | mUSD ~4% (Monad); DeFi-wide |
| Margen de FX | — | — |
| Servicios | — | crypto on-ramp, crypto off-ramp, crypto-settled card, virtual cards |
| Stablecoins | Sí | Sí |
| KYC | No | Solo tarjeta |
| Regiones activas | América del Norte, Europa, América Latina, África, MENA, Asia, Oceanía | América del Norte, Europa, América Latina, África, MENA, Asia, Oceanía |
| Usuarios declarados | — | — |
Figures compiled from public sources, for comparison only — not financial advice. "Up to" rates change constantly; always confirm with the issuer. Spotted an error? Suggest a fix.