Pockit vs Suits Me
short answerBoth are traditional neobanks with similar positioning — the real differences are FX markup, fees, license and geography, compared field by field below.
Pockit: Accounts for the underbanked; absorbed Monese users.
Suits Me: No-credit-check accounts for excluded workers.
Side by side
| Pockit | Suits Me | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | traditional | traditional |
| Audience | underbanked | underbanked |
| HQ | London, UK | Cheshire, UK |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Custody | Custodial | Custodial |
| Regulation | E-money institution | E-money institution |
| License detail | E-money via FCA-authorised EMIs (Modulr, PSI-Pay); owns Monese's EMI license | E-money accounts issued by PrePay Technologies (FCA EMI, FRN 900010); Suits Me acts as agent/programme manager |
| Card | MC · Prepaid | MC · Debit |
| Cashback | — | Retail cashback |
| Yield | — | — |
| FX markup | — | — |
| Services | — | — |
| Stablecoins | No | No |
| KYC | Yes | Yes |
| Regions | Europe | Europe |
| Reported users | — | — |
go deeperFull profiles: Pockit · Suits Me — or run your own comparison of up to four in the directory.
Figures compiled from public sources, for comparison only — not financial advice. "Up to" rates change constantly; always confirm with the issuer. Spotted an error? Suggest a fix.