← back

Qonto vs Finom

traditional vs traditional · from the open dataset of 380 tracked neobanks · no affiliate links, ever

short answerBoth are traditional neobanks with similar positioning — the real differences are FX markup, fees, license and geography, compared field by field below.

Qonto: 500K+ SME clients across FR/DE/ES/IT.

Finom: SMB/freelancer banking across the EU.

Side by side

QontoFinom
Categorytraditionaltraditional
AudienceSMB & startupsSMB & startups
HQParis, FRAmsterdam, NL
Founded20162019
CustodyCustodialCustodial
RegulationLicense pending (partner model today)E-money institution
License detailPayment institution (ACPR); pursuing credit licenseE-money institution (FINOM Payments B.V., DNB Netherlands); EU/EEA passporting
CardMC · Business debitVisa · Business debit
CashbackUp to 3%
Yield
FX markupEntry card 2% on non-EUR card payments; Plus 1%; X plan 0% (business only) (2026-07)
Servicesfiat pay-in (bank rails), fiat pay-out (bank rails), own IBAN / account no., virtual cards
StablecoinsNoNo
KYCYesYes
RegionsEuropeEurope
Reported users
go deeperFull profiles: Qonto · Finom — or run your own comparison of up to four in the directory.

Who owns them? Qonto · Finom
Alternatives: Qonto · Finom

Figures compiled from public sources, for comparison only — not financial advice. "Up to" rates change constantly; always confirm with the issuer. Spotted an error? Suggest a fix.