← back

N26 vs bunq

traditional vs traditional · from the open dataset of 380 tracked neobanks · no affiliate links, ever

short answerBoth are traditional neobanks with similar positioning — the real differences are FX markup, fees, license and geography, compared field by field below.

N26: 8M+ customers; crypto via partner in some markets.

bunq: EU-wide; API-first; 'Bank of The Free'.

Side by side

N26bunq
Categorytraditionaltraditional
Audiencegeneralgeneral
HQBerlin, DEAmsterdam, NL
Founded20132012
CustodyCustodialCustodial
RegulationLicensed bankLicensed bank
License detailGerman banking licenseDutch banking license
CardMC · DebitMC · Debit
Cashback1% (plan)
Yield~2-4% (region)Up to ~3.4% interest
FX markup0% N26 markup on card payments; Mastercard rate passed through (Standard plan) (2026-07)Mastercard rate + 0.5% up to €1,000/yr; 3% conversion fee above that (Free plan) (2026-07)
Servicescrypto on-ramp, crypto off-ramp, fiat pay-in (bank rails), fiat pay-out (bank rails), own IBAN / account no., virtual cardsfiat pay-in (bank rails), fiat pay-out (bank rails), own IBAN / account no., multi-currency hold, virtual cards
StablecoinsNoNo
KYCYesYes
RegionsEuropeEurope
Reported users
go deeperFull profiles: N26 · bunq — or run your own comparison of up to four in the directory.

Who owns them? N26 · bunq
Alternatives: N26 · bunq

Figures compiled from public sources, for comparison only — not financial advice. "Up to" rates change constantly; always confirm with the issuer. Spotted an error? Suggest a fix.